<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Copyright Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyrightblog.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Arguments, debates and ideas about copyright.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='copyrightblog.co.uk' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://copyrightblog.co.uk/osd.xml" title="Copyright Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The IPO hits back</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/05/07/the-ipo-hits-back/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/05/07/the-ipo-hits-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AND SO BEHOLD, ladies and gentlemen, the hastily cobbled together rebuttal that the Intellectual Property Office has put forward to defend their orphan works legislation which became law last week. Andrew Orlowski has his own useful explainer here Since it is cobbled together and defensive, the IPO document is not very detailed and focuses mainly&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=347&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/05/07/the-ipo-hits-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>D-ERR. UK copyright owners no longer control the right to copy their work</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/29/d-err-cretins-1-creators-0/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/29/d-err-cretins-1-creators-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collective licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK abolished copyright today. At least, they abolished a large part of the “framework” which supports it by doing away with the requirement, in many cases, to have permission from the owner before you use someone’s work. Now, if you don’t know who the owner is, you don’t have to ask them.* The UK&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=322&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/29/d-err-cretins-1-creators-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;d have thought China would be the defenders of copyright?</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/26/whod-have-thought-china-would-be-the-defenders-of-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/26/whod-have-thought-china-would-be-the-defenders-of-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was a nipper, trying to licence rights in various things, it was widely reckoned that it wasn&#8217;t worth trying to do business in China because they pretty much ignored copyright there. If they wanted to use something they just did, without asking first. Whether that was an unfair generalisation or not, the same&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=318&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/26/whod-have-thought-china-would-be-the-defenders-of-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laurie Kaye on the Supreme Court&#8217;s weird NLA judgement</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/25/laurie-kaye-on-the-supreme-courts-weird-nla-judgement/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/25/laurie-kaye-on-the-supreme-courts-weird-nla-judgement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article 5.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Directive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The always-wise Laurie Kaye has some useful memories which concur with mine. His take on the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent judgement about the NLA is useful reading. Lord Sumption should give it a squizz. As I recall, the majority of the discussions around Article 5.1 concerned these kinds of temporary copies made by the Telcos&#8217; networks and&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=316&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/25/laurie-kaye-on-the-supreme-courts-weird-nla-judgement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange things happen in courts</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/17/strange-things-happen-in-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/17/strange-things-happen-in-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article 5.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meltwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is odd. The Supreme Court has handed down its judgement in the endless NLA case, and it&#8217;s a little strange. They have also referred the case on to the European Court of Justice, to ensure that the agony is prolonged a little longer. Among the many oddities is that this judgement, weird though it&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=310&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/04/17/strange-things-happen-in-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meltwater loses again: the black knight rises</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/03/21/meltwater-loses-again-the-black-knight-rises/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/03/21/meltwater-loses-again-the-black-knight-rises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meltwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meltwater have followed up their defeat in a series of British courts with a defeat in an American court. AP sued them for copying AP stories, and they won. In the opinion which accompanied the summary judgement (I&#8217;ll look for it online, I have an emailed copy), the judge is scathing about almost every point&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=306&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/03/21/meltwater-loses-again-the-black-knight-rises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A turning point: is professional creativity under threat?</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/02/08/a-turning-point-is-professional-creativity-no-longer-viable/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/02/08/a-turning-point-is-professional-creativity-no-longer-viable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot going on, and I have been keeping my thoughts to myself. For the most part, it&#8217;s a bit depressing. The UK government (PDF link) is still seeking to change the law so that new exceptions (aka appropriations) to copyright can be introduced whimsically by politicians without bothering to trouble parliament&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=295&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2013/02/08/a-turning-point-is-professional-creativity-no-longer-viable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Permission to know what is going on, sir?</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/12/12/permission-to-know-what-is-going-on-sir/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/12/12/permission-to-know-what-is-going-on-sir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remake the internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have released a new thingy, which allows people to save web content to their Google Drive (Google&#8217;s cloud-based storage thing), and do various things to it like add comments and annotations. Nothing much unusual about that, and there are lots of similar things out there like the formerly discussed bo.lt. Not to mention every&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=289&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/12/12/permission-to-know-what-is-going-on-sir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The French fancy making life hard for Google, but are they kidding themselves?</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/11/01/the-french-fancy-making-life-hard-for-google-but-are-they-kidding-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/11/01/the-french-fancy-making-life-hard-for-google-but-are-they-kidding-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Break the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the revelation that withdrawing from Google News seems to do little (if any) damage to publishers, Eric Schmidt has been in France trying to persuade the President not to allow news publishers to charge Google for including their content on Google News. Google says such a move would &#8220;threaten the very existence&#8221; of Google.&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=287&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/11/01/the-french-fancy-making-life-hard-for-google-but-are-they-kidding-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No to Google News: common sense or suicide? &#8211; An update</title>
		<link>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/10/26/no-to-google-news-common-sense-or-suicide-an-update/</link>
		<comments>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/10/26/no-to-google-news-common-sense-or-suicide-an-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightblog.co.uk/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well that didn&#8217;t take long. Apparently the Brazilian boycott of Google News has cost them just 5% of their traffic. They think that&#8217;s &#8220;a price worth paying&#8221;. I&#8217;d say so too. I don&#8217;t know how their revenues stack up but I would be surprised if the financial cost was much greater than zero. As Techcrunch&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=copyrightblog.co.uk&#038;blog=21105404&#038;post=278&#038;subd=copyrightblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://copyrightblog.co.uk/2012/10/26/no-to-google-news-common-sense-or-suicide-an-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b384ec39d38068a496d1b2ba212a6545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dominicy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
